Father’s Day for Brad Pitt and Moneyball Dropped
Hey guys! I’m sorry I didn’t post this morning - my family and I headed out to spend Father’s Day with our favorite guy at a Christmas-themed amusement park that’s fairly near my home. We spent all day there and have only just gotten back.
But where I dropped the ball with timing, I won’t drop it with info! First of all let me wish a wonderful Happy Father’s day to a great dad - Brad Pitt! And chances are he had plenty of time to spend with his kids because…
Sony has dropped Moneyball.
The film was set to begin shooting tomorrow (Monday) morning but apparently the higher ups in Sony have decided that the script that they were going to shoot is too far removed from the script that was given the green light to feel comfortable shooting the film. This means that they either have to find a new financial backer or the script will be sentenced to being forgotten about.
And while this kind of stinks for Brad, I’m sure that he’ll have another movie to film soon (if Moneyball isn’t revived) and while he’s in waiting he can spend plenty of time with his favorite people - his family!
Included below is a photo of the new Inglourious Basterds poster from Italy (which is just really sweet) as well as a few photos of Brad on his motorcycle in LA yesterday! And, of course, some of my favorite “Brad as Dad” photos.
Enjoy and I hope that all the fathers out there had a great Father’s Day!














June 21st, 2009 at 7:36 pm
I have a feeling this was not a surprise to Brad or Sodenberg or the rest of the cast. There must have been talks for weeks about the script. This decision didn’t just come out of the blue, not with a major A-list star attached. Studios don’t mess with stars like that. The script must have been really awful!!! I wonder if it is dead in the water or if another studio will pick it up?
Also, if the film is indeed on the shelf, will Angie, Brad and kids go to France to spend the summer or stay in L.A.??
P.S.: “Moneyball” never sounded like an interesting film to me. I can’t imagine anybody other than a rabid baseball fan wanted to watch it.
June 22nd, 2009 at 7:41 am
Haha… the cover picture’s adorable… What a face…
Thanks for the work Randi.
June 22nd, 2009 at 7:58 am
As for “Moneyball” … perhaps something more down Kevin Costner’s alley? (Was I mean now?) If anyone out there writes a baseball script, Kevin will come…
I’m sort of with m s l e w i s on this one as far as interest for a baseball movie goes. Certainly wouldn’t be interesting anywhere else (at least a definite NO in Europe) - except for perhaps a lukewarm opening in the U.S. and Japan.
I have for some reason been thinking of Brad in terms of an “Indiana Jones”-movie lately. A brushed off, newer version of the old Harrison Ford movies. The concept might be a bit “done” and overwith perhaps, especially since there was a new movie out just last year with Harrison.
But since the trend is to start from the very beginning of the story (the Bond-movies, all of the Comic-based movies… they’ve all jumped on the train) - I think Brad would be rather fitting as a younger Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford’s portrail of the character was alwas from a late middle aged man and onward to an older man). That cheeky, happy go lucky and sometimes sheepish way Brad has about him would work brilliantly as a young Jones…
Just some thoughts on a Monday…
June 22nd, 2009 at 9:02 am
007, I doubt Brad would be intersted in doing the Ford version of Indiana Jones but if he does (as reported) the “Lost City of Z” then he will play an explorer in the Amazon who is searching for a lost city. However, this man never returned. That would be a much more dramatic story than the cartoonish “Indian Jones” movies.
June 22nd, 2009 at 11:20 am
I just needed to get the classic swashbuckling explorer-craving sated
And if the “Lost City of Z” is to be done - then I’d be quite happy! The story surrounding archeologist Percy Fawcett and the manuscript makes for a rather enticing concept… I’d look forward to seeing that more than any baseball-movie. Thanks m s l e w i s.
In the end though, we’ll just have to wait and see what he chooses to do. Untill then, there’s always going to be “Inglourious Basterds” to wait for.
June 22nd, 2009 at 1:13 pm
jenny
If you had read the new reports , you would know it is widely reported that Angelina and kids are still living at East coast and Brad was staying in L.A, Though he joined them for Father’s day. But they aren’t living in the same city right now.
And now with Sony dropping Moneyball , although i read Soderberg made a new deal with Columbia over the weekend , But still it will probably get shot with delay. We will see if he joins his family for vacation or not.
June 22nd, 2009 at 2:00 pm
Why is anyone reporting a tab mag/site report that Brad is not with his family. I mean really. Angie’s movie wrapped 2 weeks ago. She, Madd and Pax flew together.. so I guess the other kids were left without either parent. NOT.. someone is always speculating that the Jolie-Pitts are not together. Brad/Angie have kept their family together for 4 years through many movies. So why would this be any different. NOT.. As far as Moneyball I am just concerned that all this script drama will affect the movie. We will have to see one way or another. But I am 99.9 % sure the family is together and fine. I can’t say 100% because no one really know what the family does day to day.
June 22nd, 2009 at 4:15 pm
yes, of course angelina is still in new york! lolololololololololol
widely reported? by who? source? i have not seen anything to make me believe angelina and kids are NOT in L.A.
*does happy dance*!
June 22nd, 2009 at 4:44 pm
i see now, O.K magazine! lol
they claim angelina is in new york filming SALT, even though they have had a freckin wrap party for SALT about 2 weeks ago in new york
brad would also not leave L.A because he is needed at meeting to try and “save” money-ball”.
like i said, brad has been L.A for a while, as has angie and kids, apart from angie WRD day, and now angie is back in L.A with brad.
also, if SALT needs re-shoots in new york , angie has to be in NYC, so no bigge
I WIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! disappointed losses!
SCREAM FOR ME TROLL, EVEN YOU KNOW O.K MAG IS LYING, SALT HAS WRAPPED IN NYC!
June 22nd, 2009 at 7:08 pm
to dissapointed:
just a piece of advice if you’re a new fan of this family, don’t believe in tabs. they are known to make stupid crap rumors about this family for the past 4 years already and although they are publicly proven wrong, they are (tabs) still not ashamed of their stupidness and still make stupid crap reports. only dumb people would believe and buy their stories, i hope you’re not of those idiots.
June 22nd, 2009 at 10:42 pm
There will always be those who believe the ragmags!! It’s just human nature. In the stories I read after Angie did her work for Refugee Day, it was reported that she flew in on a private jet and flew out, returning to Los Angeles. Why would she still be in NY? And why would she be in NY without her other four children?
I’m sure we will see on Wednesday when the ragmags come out that they are insisting that Angie and Brad are “living apart” because that’s a much better story for them than having the two of them together and happy.
June 22nd, 2009 at 11:30 pm
Phillip Noyce Talks “Salt”
http://www.darkhorizons.com/news/14469/exclusive-phillip-noyce-talks-salt-
Best part is when he talks about Angelina Jolie:
“… the major thing the audience is going to find is that the movie’s a showcase for the incredibly diverse talents of Angelina Jolie. When I say “incredibly”, that’s not an understatement. Incredibly diverse. … she’s a brilliant dramatic actress. But … she’s shown that she can kick ass as good as any man. In this film, she gets to do both and she does both in a way that I think will startle audiences. It’s highly dramatic, it’s highly emotional. It’s a thrill a minute. People are going to be very, very surprised by what they see, and by what they see her do. As I have been.”
Noyce also compares Angie with Harrison Ford!
It’s definitely an awesome interview.
BTW:
1) Noyce mentions kids going to set often to visit;
2) IMDB: Salt status changed from “Filming” to “Post production”.
June 23rd, 2009 at 5:17 am
Looks like disappointed has been owned! lol!
it will be back soon though, from the cess-pitt that is just jared, and disappointed will be back with a new name talking about “i hope brad and angie have not broken-up, but the rumours seem true, they have 6 kids, i hope brad and angie work their problems out” for the thousandth time!
the silence is deafening from “disappointed”!
SCREAM FOR ME TROLL!!!!!!!! YOU SUCK!
June 23rd, 2009 at 6:01 am
Why not just ignore the likes of “D i s a p p o i n t e d” ? They want reactions, so the best thing to do is to simply ignore their comments. It all turns so distasteful with the replies.
Keep a positive mind
June 23rd, 2009 at 4:52 pm
There are two different people in Twitter spotting Brad in Georgetown in D.C 1 hour ago.
Now it makes you to go hmmm. He didn’t travel with Angie to Washington when she had to be there , But when she finished her job there and left the city for an unknown place , He went to the same city she was.
Why didn’t he travel with Angie to D.C if he had a work to do there? Why did he travel to the same city Angie was at different time while he could travel with her and could take care of his business while she was also in the town.
It’s obvious he doesn’t want to spend time with Angie and prefer to travel to places alone and apart from Angie.That tells alot.
Now how are you going to explain this obvious weird action by them? I wonder if those rumors of them living apart is true.
June 23rd, 2009 at 5:40 pm
It is a sad read for me and probably you. apparently Tabloids are right almost 90% of the time. And IT says their sources are their nanny or their BG most of the time and how they stand by their latest article about them fighting even in Angie’s birthday and how Brad really is comunicating with JA recently. READ IT. Copy and Paste the link.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The Brangelina Industry
Each week celebrity magazines breathlessly report yet another twist in the Jen-Brad-Angelina love triangle. But where do the stories come from? Are they ever true? And does that even matter?
Oliver Burkeman
The Guardian, Wednesday 24 June 2009
Pure fabrication by magazines is rare, Navarre maintains. “Coming from hard news, we had this idea that in gossip, everything’s fake. But now I’m on the gossip side, I’m surprised by how most of the time it’s not. You’ll have a little bit of news - a hint. I thought the fight between Angelina and Aniston would be totally fake, but it’s not. Ninety per cent of the time, it comes from something true.” Besides, he says, sounding briefly like a French poststructuralist philosopher, “there is this idea that there is only one truth, and that you have to stick to it. But maybe not.”
The blogosphere has greatly exacerbated this what-is-truth-anyway? approach. At sites such as Gawker and Defamer, Hollywood gossip is breathlessly consumed, but also marinaded in a rich sauce of cynicism. Readers are happy to engage with the narrative - and even buy ironic Team Aniston and Team Jolie T-shirts - without assuming any particular story to be true. The same is surely true of many readers of the weeklies. But the blogs, unlike the magazines, can admit it.
Richard Spencer at In Touch is adamant that quotations attributed to “an insider” in his magazine always come from “someone very close to the celebrity, or someone the celebrity employs - anyone from a bodyguard to a nanny to a friend to a hairstylist”, and that they’re never paid. (They share their gossip, he says, because “it’s human nature”.) But he’s happy to acknowledge that truth can be kaleidoscopic. “Different friends tell different people different things,” he says when I point out blatant contradictions between his magazine and others. “It’s not a question of anyone being wrong. If you were having divorce trouble, one friend could say, ‘Oh, they’re solid, nothing to worry about.’ Another could say: ‘You didn’t see the fight I saw last night. She was crying in the bathroom.’”
“Angelina’s birthday ends in tears,” reports the current edition of In Touch. “A friend” explains that “too much togetherness has taken its toll”. The magazine adds: “While Brad did go to a lot of trouble for Angelina’s 34th - presenting her with a specially commissioned painting of their family, as well as lingerie from Angelina’s favourite store, Agent Provocateur - it wasn’t long before the troubled couple erupted in a fight over Brad’s ex-wife … ‘Things were going fine, and then Angie started accusing Brad of meeting Jen in LA,’ says an associate.”
When you spend too much time poring over celebrity magazines, and interviewing their employees, odd things start to happen to your brain. You catch yourself wondering: might the magazines’ hunger for new storylines somehow exert an influence on reality itself? According to the laws of some strange physics, unstudied by scientists, might the narrative necessity of a Brangelina divorce lead to one actually happening, in real life?
Well, not for now, according to last week’s People, which unsurprisingly offers an entirely different take from In Touch. Angelina’s birthday celebrations, it seems, went flawlessly - and happened not at the couple’s Long Island mansion but on the set of Jolie’s latest film, Salt. (In Touch agrees that Pitt visited the set of Salt, but quotes a “pal” who says “they’re just going through the motions for appearance’s sake”.)
For Mother’s Day, which is celebrated in May in the US, “Brad gave Angelina inscribed jewellery,” People adds. An unnamed friend provides the article’s closing quote: “They are very, very happy.”
guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2009/jun/24/magazines-media-aniston-jolie-pitt
June 23rd, 2009 at 6:00 pm
First of all,HAPPY FATHER’S DAY for Brad Pitt and for every other dad,and Randi,thank you for the pics!!!They are wonderful!
Disappointed person,why don’t you please stop that.At least here!!!Nobody believe what you are saying!We can always explain every one of your “obvious weird actions”!
If…IF Brad is in DC(just because two people in Twitter said it,doesn’t mean it’s true,who says that Angie is not with him?And what if she isn’t?Why go back in DC if Brad had to go there for work and probably for a couple of days?And we all can guess why Brad wasn’t in DC with Angie for WRD.He was set to begin shooting Moneyball,and we all know that.Sony has dropped the movie the last minute.
We(you,me and everybody here)don’t know Brad and Angie’s schedule,so we can’t be sure where they are every day!Don’t pretend that you do!
007,you are sooo right!The best thing to do is to simply ignore those comments.But sometimes it’s hard,at least for me!Maybe I’ll try to take your advice next time…
June 23rd, 2009 at 10:20 pm
wtf? dissapointed, i don’t know if you are really dumb or just pretending to be one. stop acting like you’re disappointed because obviously you are wishing for them to split and you are obviously wanting for an ex reunion. aren’t you ashamed of yourself? wishing for a couple who have six children together to split so he can return to your idol who only cares about her hair and her dog? and fyi, Brad and Angie are not the only couple in HW who isn’t photographed together all the time. you believe twitter? wtf? i can twit right now and say i saw Brad Pitt and he just bought me a drink. don’t tell me you’d buy it too? if you think tabs is a reliable source,(which obviously you are basing on the quotes you just posted) then i guess you are really dumb. go ahead. continue being dumb and keep on dreaming that they’ve split. nobody’s stopping you to believe those crap, just do us all one favor, go away. stop posting your unreliable stories here. it’s funny how you spend time researching for this stupid stories and post it on a site of the couple you dislike.
June 24th, 2009 at 7:36 am
LOL, you posted that guardian article to SUPPORT your trolling arguements troll?
LOL! it bascially says all tabloid magazines lie, IT and X-17 are hardly going to admit in public they lie, it would be bad for them, as customers would feel the mags lie to them on purpouse, therefore people would stop buying mags, so would be bad for business.
btw, why would brad be in D.C? for what? and FYI, source’s say james haven is also in D.C at the mo, so brad and most likely angie are probably meeting up with james in D.C
btw, i thought u said angie left for NY troll?, now it’s an “unknown place” LOL! the unknown place is with brad u prat!
and TONS of source’s have said brad and angie were together on father’s day, and it certainly wasn’t in new york! lol! ergo in L.A or D.C u moron.
angie flew to L.A after WRD to meet back with brad and other kids, the whole jolie-pitt family waited to see what was happening with brad’s moneyball film, and most likely all the jolie-pitts have decided to fly to D.C to see james, and then maybe to have a break some-where together.
where are the reports of angelina in europe? that’s right, there are none! lol! hell, angie might even never left D.C since WRD, and brad flew into D.C with 4 other kids to meet with angie, pax and maddox.
angelina is most likely where-ever brad is or if brad has had to be at a scheduled meeting in D.C , then angie is back at a jolie-pitt house, either in L.A or NOLA.
SCREAM FOR ME TROLL! proved wrong again and every-one on here knows that you are a troll, sucks to be you! troll u suck!
disappointed, BE GONE FROM HERE, GO AWAY U BRAD AND ANGELINA RELATIONSHIP WORRIER! LOL!
what you gonna come back with troll? more info from tabs like in-touch and O.K mag? all admitting they pull stories out of their asses? LOL you gotta do better than that troll!
if brad and angie are living apart, brad lives in L.A, so where is/are angie and kids? where are the reports of angie landing
any-where? angie is with brad *does happy dance*!
June 24th, 2009 at 7:44 am
btw, disappointed is also a troll at just jared and goes to all jolie-pitt sites, even thought it is a insane hater, spreading it’s lies about a brad and angelina split that hasn’t happened! LOL! crazy bish!
i think disappointed should be banned from this site randi. how about any-one else, do you agree disappointed should be banned from tis site? why should we have to read lies on here. there is no ignore button so it is impossiable not to read what the troll posts.
i think it would be best for randi to bar disappointed from this site, or get disappointed to post some-thing OTHER than break-up talk, disappointed worries so much about where brad and angie are, it weird! LOL!
June 24th, 2009 at 9:43 am
jenny
You may want to read new reports in Internet. Go and search for this story in Google.
Apparently Brad is vacationing alone in L.A and in his Santa barbara’s villa. While Other 4 kids were in NY with their nannies and Angelina was in D.C with 2 of her kids, Brad was in L.A for a weeks.
Brad came back from Basal and came back to L.A instead of D.C where Angie was filming. And he has been in L.A for over 3 weeks alone without kids or Angelina. IT says Angelina and kids are still in NY as schools there are not closed yet and then they will go to France.
There is no proof of Angelina traveling from L.A to D.C and no proof of her coming back to L.A. Whenever Brad arrives or leaves L.A , there are reports or pics of him doing so ,but there hasn’t been any report or pic of Angelina and kids in L.A or of them arriving or leaving.
seriously how can Angelina travel from L.A to another place without any pics or reports prooving that?
June 24th, 2009 at 10:59 am
Disappointed :”Brad came back from Basal and came back to L.A instead of D.C where Angie was filming. And he has been in L.A for over 3 weeks alone without kids or Angelina.”
Really???I thought you said Brad was in DC!!!
You said:”There are two different people in Twitter spotting Brad in Georgetown in D.C 1 hour ago”
So what is true???Can you tell us?NO!!!Of course you can’t cause you DON’T KNOW!
NOBODY HERE BELIEVE YOU SO STOP POSTING ALL THOSE LIES ABOUT BRAD AND ANGIE!
June 24th, 2009 at 1:39 pm
LOL! are fucking stupid or what?
brad and angelina were together on father’s day IN L.A tool, go read the net reports.
there are always reports of brad and angie arrving in D.C, but never where they flew in to D.C from, or where they flew out to.
why does angelina need to go back to new york? does L.A have no schools? lol
IDONT K! you are an insane twat! you have shown you are a troll and not a fan. it is only “disappointed2 that is ruining this site for fans. ban disappointed and it’s IP address forever more please.
btw, SCREAM FOR ME when angelina is reported to be in L.A soon moron.
June 24th, 2009 at 2:07 pm
^
and why the fuck would i beleieve any-thing in-touch says? google search celeb blogs that will just quote the same source, in-touch weekly? fuck that! LOL!
how can brad be on vacation in his “home” town on L.A and surrounding area when brad is there for work? angelina has wrapped in NYC and D.C, ergo angie is NOT on the east coast of the U.S, or france.
angelina and kids are where-ever brad is. trust.
June 24th, 2009 at 3:48 pm
Before Brad went to Basel he went to DC where Angie was wrapping up shooting.
Angie then travelled FROM LA to DC for WRD.
THERE ARE PICS of her at the airport *Disappointed*!
Your quote of the Guardian article tells us you DON’T read whole articles, you just look at headlines for effect.
June 24th, 2009 at 4:27 pm
How in the hell can you vacation in your hometown and when did the Santa Barbara house become a ‘villa’ obviously from a foreign tabloid probably British. Where is the baby Intouchweekly claimed Angie was pregnant with in Nov are the Ethiopian girl they were adopting in Dec.In touch is your tabloid bible I see